Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.3 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10 |
| 2015-08-13 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.40 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Gray | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Glass; metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 439.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.46 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.8 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a general score of 83, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s global score of 79.3. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a newer 10 version while Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version. Although Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T is extremely newer than the Galaxy S6 edge+, it's way thicker and extremely heavier.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a better processor than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a larger number of cores. The Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a better pixels density.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has a superior camera than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has a much better resolution back-facing camera, a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited environments and a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a much longer battery duration than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.