Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-09-20 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro is much better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having a global score of 84.9 against 75.8. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro body is incredibly newer and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, but it is also just a little bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a little sharper display than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and way less brightness, it also counts with a quite better screen pixel density and a bit higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a better storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 11 Pro, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD card slot that admits up to 200 GB. Apple iPhone 11 Pro counts with a quite superior performance than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro also has a 64-bit processing unit and more CPU cores.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a slightly better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a same resolution back-facing camera, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with superior battery life than iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 31 percent more battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy S7 Active. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy S7 Active, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.