Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo has a general score of 77.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 general score. The Motorola DROID Turbo body is just a bit lighter than Galaxy S7 Active, but it's somewhat thicker and was released just a little more than a year before. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a just a little worse amount of pixels per inch of screen, and they both have the same resolution of 2560 x 1440, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a little larger screen.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Motorola DROID Turbo captures just a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has worse 24 fps video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low light photography, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a much more mega pixels back camera.
Galaxy S7 Active features a bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has only 32 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 200 GB. The Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3900mAh.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Motorola DROID Turbo is also very cheap compared to the other ones, making this phone an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.