Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a global score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's general score of 75.8. The Motorola Edge 50 is a much newer phone, and it is also a little lighter and incredibly thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. Motorola Edge 50 counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a little bit less pixels per screen inch and a little lower resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels, it also counts with much more display brightness and a really larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory and an inferior number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a back camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.