Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Mystic indigo |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus has a score of 79.7, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 global score. Even though the Moto G Stylus is just a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, it's just a little thinner and also extremely newer. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater screen density.
The Moto G Stylus counts with a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Moto G Stylus features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Moto G Stylus also has a larger number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active and Motorola Moto G Stylus have quite similar battery performance. Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 video definition and a F1.7 camera aperture, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a camera in the back with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus costs more money than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.