Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-06-06 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Gray and White |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto Z4 has an overall score of 79.8, which is a little bit better than Galaxy S7 Active's score of 75.8. The Motorola Moto Z4 design is newer, incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter than Galaxy S7 Active. Moto Z4 features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Moto Z4 also has a larger number of cores (but slower).
The Galaxy S7 Active features a sharper display than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. The Moto Z4 features a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a same size diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Moto Z4 also has a much higher resolution camera.
The Moto Z4 counts with a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. Galaxy S7 Active has a bit better battery performance than Moto Z4, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Moto Z4 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, giving up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.