Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-03-30 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X3 Pro is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, having a 79.9 score against 75.8. The OPPO Find X3 Pro design is notably newer and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, although it is also a bit heavier. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
Galaxy S7 Active counts with a little sharper display than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2560px, it also counts with a little higher display pixels density. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a much bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 13% greater battery capacity. OPPO Find X3 Pro takes much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing images or videos in low light environments, and they both have the same video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with faster video frame rates and a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.