Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Plastic | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 576 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is much better than Galaxy S7 Active's score of 75.8. Samsung Galaxy A32's body is way newer and just a little thinner than the Galaxy S7 Active's, but it is just a little bit heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A32 has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a greater number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features an incredibly better screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a way better display pixel density and a much higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Galaxy A32 counts with a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A32 takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.