Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-05-29 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is much better than Galaxy S7 Active's 75.8 score. Although Samsung Galaxy A80 is heavier than Galaxy S7 Active, it's just a bit thinner and also extremely newer. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels amount in each screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Galaxy A80 features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A80 has a bit better performance than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A80 takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A80 also counts with a back camera with way more mega pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active counts with just a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.