Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-06-10 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Black and White |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, with a general score of 90.5 against 75.8. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's construction is a lot newer and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active's, but it is heavier. The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a brighter display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a superior memory to store more apps and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A90 5G has a bit faster processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores (and they are faster).
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit longer battery life than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a very superior camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a much better resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.