Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-06-10 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro is just a bit better than the Galaxy S7 Active, getting a 78.8 score against 75.8. The vivo X60 Pro is a noticeably newer phone, and it is also just a little bit lighter and thinner than Galaxy S7 Active. Vivo X60 Pro has a better processor than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger number of cores (and they are faster) and 8 GB more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a better screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixel density. Vivo X60 Pro has a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for taking photos and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a lot higher resolution camera in the back and better video frame rate.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.