Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| 2016-06-10 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 247.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is better than the Galaxy S7 Active, getting an 85.5 score against 75.8. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a a lot newer phone, and it's also just a little bit lighter and thinner than Galaxy S7 Active. Galaxy S7 Active counts with a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same brightness, the Galaxy S7 Active also counts with a higher number of pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has more RAM memory and 4 more cpu cores. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting pictures and video in low-light environments, and they both have the same video resolution and a same resolution camera, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with higher 60 fps video frame rates.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB and 256 GB internal memory. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's battery duration is just as good as the battery duration in Galaxy S7 Active.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is way more expensive than Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.