Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is just a bit better than Galaxy S7 edge, having an 81.2 score against 78.1. Both devices we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version and Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Motorola Edge 50 is a notably newer cellphone than the Galaxy S7 edge, but it is a little thicker and somewhat heavier.
Motorola Edge 50 has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch of display and a bit lower 1220 x 2712 resolution, it also counts with a bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 features much more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S7 edge counts with a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory and 4 lesser cores (although faster). Motorola Edge 50 features a very superior battery life than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 39 percent greater battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and videos in low light environments, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.