Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-03-11 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 336.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S7 edge's 78.1 overall score. Galaxy C9 Pro is a newer and just a little bit thinner device than the Galaxy S7 edge, but it's somewhat heavier. Both phones we compare here work with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy C9 Pro has an older 6.0 Marshmallow version while Galaxy S7 edge has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 edge has a much better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a little faster processor than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a greater amount of RAM and more cpu cores (but slower).
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a SD extension slot that holds up to 256 GB and more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a way lower 12 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light captures and videos and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.