Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 336.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 534 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.6 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 edge has a general score of 78.1, which is slightly better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro's global score of 77.8. Although Galaxy S7 edge is incredibly older and extremely thicker than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's body is still way lighter. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S7 edge has 8.0 Oreo version and vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a little worse pixel amount in each inch of display, it also counts with a higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a much larger screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S7 edge counts with a much faster processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and a lower amount of RAM. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 58% bigger battery size. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater camera than Galaxy S7 edge, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a camera with lot more MP, a lot better video quality and a way larger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy S7 edge not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.