Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 has a global score of 79.5, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's general score of 76.4. The Galaxy S7 design is newer, somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, and they both have 4 processing cores, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an additional graphics co-processor.
Motorola Droid Turbo has just a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a quite inferior pixels count in each screen inch, and they both have the same resolution of 2560 x 1440, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a bit larger display. Motorola Droid Turbo takes a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture and lower 24 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a lot more MP back-facing camera.
The Galaxy S7 features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Galaxy S7 also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 200 GB. Motorola Droid Turbo features greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy S7 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.