Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.6 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S7 has a general score of 79.5, which is a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 general score. Galaxy S7's body is newer, extremely thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola DROID Turbo. Motorola DROID Turbo has a little bit better performance than Galaxy S7, because although it has 1 GB lesser RAM memory, and they both have 4 cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra GPU.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit sharper display than Galaxy S7, because although it has a little inferior pixels count in each display inch, and they both have the same resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a little bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S7 features more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 200 GB.
Motorola DROID Turbo has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. Motorola DROID Turbo takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has slower video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures and video in low light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a lot higher 20.7 MP resolution camera.
Galaxy S7 not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheaper, making this phone a very good choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.