Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-11 | 2019-06-06 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z4 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S7, with a general score of 79.8 against 79.5. Motorola Moto Z4's body is noticeably newer and just a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S7's, although it is a little bit heavier. Moto Z4 has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the Moto Z4 also has 4 more processing cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 features a way better display than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch in the screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. Moto Z4 has a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because it has a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
The Moto Z4 has improved battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity. Moto Z4 takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same video definition, the same video frame rate and a F1.7 camera aperture, the Moto Z4 also has a camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution and a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Although Moto Z4 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S7. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get Galaxy S7, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.