Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2021-03-30 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X3 Pro is a little bit better than Galaxy S7, getting a 79.9 score against 79.5. The OPPO Find X3 Pro design is a lot newer than Galaxy S7's, but it's just a little bit thicker and noticeably heavier. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S7 has just a bit better looking screen than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a bit lower 1440 x 2560 resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the screen. OPPO Find X3 Pro shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, higher video frame rate and a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution camera.
OPPO Find X3 Pro has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.