Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2016-03-11 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.56 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy S7, having a general score of 90.5 against 79.5. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's construction is way newer, but just a bit thicker and heavier than Samsung Galaxy S7. Galaxy S7 features a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Galaxy A90 5G has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also counts with a bigger camera sensor capturing better quality videos and pictures and a camera in the back with a way better resolution.
Galaxy A90 5G features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 96 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.