Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-11 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.36 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 124.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 855 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is a bit better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 overall score. The Galaxy S7 design is somewhat lighter than vivo X60 Pro, although it's just a bit thicker and was released many years before. The Samsung Galaxy S7 counts with a more vivid display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and a higher amount of RAM. The vivo X60 Pro captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, higher video frame rates and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
The vivo X60 Pro features a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S7, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Vivo X60 Pro features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.