Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2021-03-30 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S8 Active has a global score of 81.9, which is a little bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 global score. Samsung Galaxy S8 Active's construction is way older, thicker and just a little heavier than OPPO Find X3 Pro. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a bit better looking screen than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display and a little lower 1440 x 2960px resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixel density.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little better battery life than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels, a much bigger sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality and better video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.