Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-08-11 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 568 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 has an overall score of 84.7, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active's overall score of 81.9. Samsung Galaxy A32's design is incredibly newer, just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy S8 Active. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A32. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active features a lot better screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a much greater display density. Galaxy A32 counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A32 takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a lot better resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy A32 has better battery life than Galaxy S8 Active, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.