Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-08-11 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.99 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 245.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S8 Active is a little bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, getting a overall score of 81.9 against 78.8. Galaxy S8 Active's design is extremely older, somewhat heavier and way thicker than vivo X60 Pro. The Samsung Galaxy S8 Active counts with a bit sharper screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 resolution and more pixels per screen inch.
Vivo X60 Pro features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM. Vivo X60 Pro has a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S8 Active, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. Vivo X60 Pro shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy S8 Active, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low light photos, and they both have the same video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera, a lot bigger camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and faster video frame rate.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.