Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-04-21 | 2021-03-30 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 173.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 has a score of 81.7, which is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Pro's global score of 79.9. Even though Galaxy S8 is extremely older than OPPO Find X3 Pro, it's body is lighter and a bit thinner. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little faster CPU than Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S8 counts with just a bit better screen than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better screen density. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera, a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and better 60 fps video frame rate.
OPPO Find X3 Pro features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy S8, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory capacity. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S8, because it has a 50% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.