Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2017-04-21 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 568 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S8's 81.7 global score. Galaxy A32's design is extremely newer, but notably heavier and thicker than the Galaxy S8. Samsung Galaxy S8 features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way higher resolution of 1440 x 2960px and much more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 features much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S8, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 1 TB. The Galaxy S8 features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A32. They have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a superior battery performance than Galaxy S8, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A32 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy S8, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking images and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.