Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-04-21 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 173.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 8 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S8 is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 81.7 score against 77.8. Galaxy S8's body is much lighter than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it's thicker and was released 7 years before. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a sharper display than Galaxy S8, because although it has a way worse pixel count per screen inch, it also counts with a slightly better 2200 x 2480px resolution and a way larger screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S8, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Galaxy S8 counts with a very superior processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes greater videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much higher 7680x4320 video quality, a much higher 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a much larger sensor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery performance than Galaxy S8, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S8 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.