Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-04-21 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.86 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.47 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Arctic silver, Burgundy red, Coral blue, Maple gold, Midnight black, Orchid gray and Rose pink | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 173.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 540 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.79 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S8 is a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, getting an 81.7 score against 78.8. The Samsung Galaxy S8 design is lighter than vivo X60 Pro, although it's just a little thicker and was released many years before. The Galaxy S8 features a little bit better looking display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2960 and a better screen density.
Vivo X60 Pro has a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S8, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Vivo X60 Pro features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy S8, because it has a 40 percent bigger battery size. The vivo X60 Pro has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S8, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light captures, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with better video frame rate, a camera with much more megapixels and a much larger back-facing camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.