Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| -- | iOS 15.x |
| 2018-03-16 | 2022-03-18 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 568 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2022) is a bit better than the Galaxy S9, getting a score of 86.6 against 83.3. The iPhone SE (2022) body is a lot newer, somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy S9. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has less cpu cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone SE (2022) also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The Galaxy S9 has a little more vivid display than iPhone SE (2022), because it has way more pixels per screen inch, a larger screen and a lot better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution. Galaxy S9 has a much better memory for applications and games than iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S9 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 400 GB.
Galaxy S9 has a really longer battery life than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S9 features just a bit better camera than iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same video frame rates and a 12 mega-pixels camera, the Galaxy S9 also has a bigger aperture.
Although iPhone SE (2022) is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy S9, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S9. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the iPhone SE (2022), but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Galaxy S9, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.