Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-03-30 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is just a bit better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, getting an 83.3 score against 79.9. Galaxy S9 is a lighter cellphone than OPPO Find X3 Pro, but they are 0.33inches thick. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S9, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S9 has a little sharper display than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a bit lower 1440 x 2960 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixels density. The OPPO Find X3 Pro captures much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features more memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 50% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.