Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | TFT |
| 568 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.34 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S9's 83.3 general score. Galaxy A32's construction is extremely newer than the Samsung Galaxy S9's, but it is a bit thicker and noticeably heavier. The Galaxy S9 has a little faster CPU than Galaxy A32. Both have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy S9 features a much sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with much more pixels per screen inch and a much better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution. Galaxy A32 takes a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution.
The Galaxy A32 has a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S9, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy A32 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The Galaxy A32 has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S9, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.