Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.3 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-03-16 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.75 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 158.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2960 x 1440 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 568 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.34 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S9 is a little bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, getting a general score of 83.3 against 78.8. Although Samsung Galaxy S9 is notably older and just a little thicker than vivo X60 Pro, it's construction is still a little bit lighter. Vivo X60 Pro features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S9, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy S9 counts with a little more vivid display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2960 pixels and a higher pixel density. The vivo X60 Pro has a better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S9, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
The vivo X60 Pro has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S9, because it has a 4200mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The vivo X60 Pro shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy S9, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same video resolution and the same video frame rate, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality and a much better 48 MP resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.