Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Star
Dual SIM| Global Score | |
| 51.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.1 | -- |
| 2013-03-15 | 2018-06-08 |
| 4.14 x 2.30 x 0.47 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 3.62 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3 inches | 6 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 133 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.38 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 320 hours standby time 14 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.88 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Compass | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V35 ThinQ is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy Star, getting an 81.3 score against 51.7. Although LG V35 ThinQ is incredibly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Star, it's noticeably thinner and also noticeably newer. The LG V35 ThinQ has an incredibly better screen than Samsung Galaxy Star, because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 2880, a really larger display and a lot better count of pixels per inch of display.
The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Star, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Star, because it has 7 more cores and 5,5 GB more RAM.
LG V35 ThinQ has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Star, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 1200mAh. The LG V35 ThinQ has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Star, because it has a much better (4K) video resolution and a way higher 16 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
LG V35 ThinQ costs a bit more money than Galaxy Star, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.