Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Stellar
SCH-I200| Global Score | |
| 61 | 67.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 4.1, 4.0 | -- |
| -- | 2016-12-01 |
| 4.80 x 2.51 x 0.47 inches | 5.78 x 2.79 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.73 ounces | 4.94 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 250.00 | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 233 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 400 8926 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 305 GPU |
| 8.1 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 11.36 |
| Camera | |
| 3.20 MP + 1.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.27 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 216 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4 | 4.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
HTC Desire 650 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Stellar, having a score of 67.1 against 61. HTC Desire 650 is a a bit heavier but thinner phone than Samsung Galaxy Stellar. The Galaxy Stellar counts with a little sharper screen than HTC Desire 650, although it has a way lower 800 x 480 resolution, a way smaller screen and a little bit lower screen pixel density.
HTC Desire 650 features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy Stellar, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores (and faster) and a higher amount of RAM. The HTC Desire 650 shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Stellar, because it has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels and a much better video quality.
The HTC Desire 650 features a lot bigger storage for applications and games than Galaxy Stellar, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory. The HTC Desire 650 has just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Stellar, because it has 2200mAh of battery capacity against 2100mAh.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, HTC Desire 650 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.