Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.1 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Tizen | -- |
| 2020-08-06 | 2018-08-24 |
| 1.67 x 1.61 x 0.44 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 1.70 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| Mystic silver and Stainless steel: Mystic bronze | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 450.00 | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 1.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 360 x 360 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9110 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Dual-Core 1150 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.83 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| -- | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 0 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 247mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 1.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is a lot better than Galaxy Watch 3 (41mm), with an 87.1 score against 52.1. Galaxy Note9 is an older and heavier phone than the Galaxy Watch 3 (41mm), but Samsung was able to build it way thinner anyway. Galaxy Note9 counts with a lot better performance than Galaxy Watch 3 (41mm), because it has a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Note9 has a much better looking display than Galaxy Watch 3 (41mm), because it has a little bit higher screen density, a way larger screen and a much higher 1440 x 2960 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Watch 3 (41mm). The Galaxy Note9 features a way bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy Watch 3 (41mm), because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Note9 has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Watch 3 (41mm), because it has a 1519% larger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 costs a bit more money than the Galaxy Watch 3 (41mm), but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.