Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Win
GT-I8550, GT-I8552Motorola Droid Turbo
32 GB| Global Score | |
| 60.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.1 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.25 x 2.78 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.08 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gray and White | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 175.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 199 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8225Q chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 203 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 4.62 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.2 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Win, getting a 76.4 score against 60.7. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but Motorola Droid Turbo has a more recent 4.4.4 version while Samsung Galaxy Win has Android 4.1, so it counts with some nice extra features and optimized performance. Motorola Droid Turbo's body is somewhat heavier and thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Win.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has an incredibly better display than Galaxy Win, because it has a much higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px, a little bigger screen and a way better quantity of pixels per display inch. Motorola Droid Turbo features a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Win, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a better performing processor than Samsung Galaxy Win, and although they both have 4 cores, the Motorola Droid Turbo also has a much better 500 megahertz graphics processing unit and a larger amount of RAM. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Win, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola Droid Turbo captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Win, because it has a much better resolution back-facing camera and a lot higher video resolution.
Motorola Droid Turbo costs a bit more than Galaxy Win, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.