Global Score | |
58.9 | 64.8 |
Basic Information | |
Samsung | Nokia |
Android 4.1.2 | Android 9.0 Pie |
2013-01-25 | 2019-06-10 |
5.14 x 2.67 x 0.47 inches | 6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches |
5.24 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
Black, Gray and Red | Black |
-- | Metal and Plastic |
Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
$ 90.00 | $ 90.00 |
Display / Screen | |
4 inches | 5.5 inches |
480 x 800 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
TFT | IPS LCD |
233 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
7.6 | 7.3 |
Performance | |
-- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
7.83 | 8.73 |
Storage | |
4 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
3.82 | 8.12 |
Camera | |
5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
-- | f/2.00 aperture |
1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
5.94 | 8.47 |
Networks | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
SIM | Nano SIM |
4.2 | 6.1 |
Battery Life | |
1700mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2990mAh Battery |
Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
570 hours standby time 15.1 hours talk time | -- |
3.52 | 4.96 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
GPS | GPS |
Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
-- | FM Radio |
The Nokia 3.1 A is better than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2, having a overall score of 64.8 against 58.9. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Nokia 3.1 A has 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2 has Android 4.1.2 version. The Nokia 3.1 A body is a lot newer and extremely thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2.
Nokia 3.1 A counts with a better processing power than Galaxy Xcover 2, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (and also faster). Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2 has a slightly better looking display than Nokia 3.1 A, although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, a way worse 800 x 480 resolution and a way smaller display.
Nokia 3.1 A takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2, because it has a lot more MP back camera and a lot higher 1920x1080 video definition. The Nokia 3.1 A features a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Xcover 2, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB and more internal storage capacity.
The Nokia 3.1 A counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy Xcover 2, because it has a 2990mAh battery capacity against 1700mAh.
The Nokia 3.1 A costs exactly the same than Galaxy Xcover 2.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.