Search


Compare phones

Global Score
58.964.8
Basic Information
SamsungNokia
Android 4.1.2Android 9.0 Pie
2013-01-252019-06-10
5.14 x 2.67 x 0.47 inches6.01 x 2.83 x 0.37 inches
5.24 ounces5.50 ounces
Black, Gray and RedBlack
--Metal and Plastic
Scratch-Resistant GlassScratch-Resistant Glass
$ 90.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
4 inches5.5 inches
480 x 800 pixels 1440 x 720 pixels
TFTIPS LCD
233 pixels per inch293 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
7.67.3
Performance
--Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset
ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processorARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 2000 MHz) processor
1 GB RAM2 GB RAM
ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPUAdreno 504 GPU
7.838.73
Storage
4 GB internal memory32 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot
3.828.12
Camera
5.00 MP + 0.30 MP8.00 MP + 5.00 MP
--f/2.00 aperture
1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
5.948.47
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
Mobile HotspotMobile Hotspot
HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSMLTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA
SIMNano SIM
4.26.1
Battery Life
1700mAh Li-Ion Battery2990mAh Battery
Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
570 hours standby time
15.1 hours talk time
--
3.524.96
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.0Bluetooth 5.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor
--FM Radio

Comparison review

The Nokia 3.1 A is better than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2, having a overall score of 64.8 against 58.9. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but the Nokia 3.1 A has 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2 has Android 4.1.2 version. The Nokia 3.1 A body is a lot newer and extremely thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2.

Nokia 3.1 A counts with a better processing power than Galaxy Xcover 2, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a higher number of cores (and also faster). Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2 has a slightly better looking display than Nokia 3.1 A, although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen, a way worse 800 x 480 resolution and a way smaller display.

Nokia 3.1 A takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 2, because it has a lot more MP back camera and a lot higher 1920x1080 video definition. The Nokia 3.1 A features a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Xcover 2, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 128 GB and more internal storage capacity.

The Nokia 3.1 A counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy Xcover 2, because it has a 2990mAh battery capacity against 1700mAh.

The Nokia 3.1 A costs exactly the same than Galaxy Xcover 2.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.