Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-20 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 8.73 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max is better than the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, getting an 84.5 score against 73.8. Even though Apple iPhone XS Max is older and heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, it's construction is still a lot thinner. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a way higher display density, a bigger display and a lot higher 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution.
The iPhone XS Max counts with a superior processor than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits processor and 1 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Xcover 4S has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than iPhone XS Max, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB.
IPhone XS Max shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a smaller camera aperture and a much less megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The iPhone XS Max has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a 3179mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.