Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.8 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-07-20 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.76 x 2.89 x 0.38 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 294 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G71 MP2 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.84 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2800mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, having a general score of 85.5 against 73.8. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 design is a little bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, although it is a little bit heavier and was released about 11 months before. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a better performing CPU than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 5 GB more RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a better looking screen than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has a way better resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels, a higher display density and a larger display. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a much bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has an external memory slot that supports 256 GB smaller, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a superior battery duration than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a better camera than Galaxy Xcover 4S, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and video in low-light environments and a way worse resolution camera, it also counts with a much better (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.