Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-12 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| LCD | IPS LCD |
| 311 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 has a score of 85, which is a bit better than Galaxy XCover 5's 78.1 score. Apple iPhone 8's body is thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy XCover 5, although it was released many years before. IPhone 8 features a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has less RAM and 2 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Apple iPhone 8 features a little more vivid display than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 750 x 1334px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher display density. IPhone 8 has just a bit bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The iPhone 8 has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a camera in the back with a much worse resolution, and they both have a same size aperture, the iPhone 8 also counts with a much better video resolution. Galaxy XCover 5 has a superior battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has a 3000mAh battery capacity instead of 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.