Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-03-12 | 2017-09-21 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | P-OLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG V30 has a global score of 79.1, which is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover 5's 78.1 global score. The LG V30 body is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than the Galaxy XCover 5, despite of the fact that it was released 4 years before. The LG V30 features a better looking display than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a much higher pixel density, a little bigger display and a much better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
The LG V30 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 cpu cores. The LG V30 counts with a better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V30 also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG V30 counts with a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 3300mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. LG V30 takes clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have a same resolution camera in the back, the LG V30 also has a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.