Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 78.1 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-03-12 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.79 x 2.82 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.07 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1480 x 720 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 311 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G52 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.02 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover 5's global score of 78.1. Although the LG V50 ThinQ is older and a little heavier than the Galaxy XCover 5, it's body is still a little thinner. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version while Galaxy XCover 5 has Android 11.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a much better pixels count per screen inch and a bigger display. The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy XCover 5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a SD memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover 5, because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 5, because although it has a camera with way less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a way better (4K) video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.