Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-29 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| -- | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 399 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.12 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, with a score of 85 against 77.6. The Apple iPhone 8 is an extremely older device than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but it's lighter and extremely thinner anyway. The Apple iPhone 8 counts with a much more powerful processor than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has 2 less cores (although faster) and 4 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Apple iPhone 8 has a bit better display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it has a really smaller screen, a way worse 750 x 1334 resolution and a just a little inferior pixels quantity in each display inch. The Apple iPhone 8 captures a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the Apple iPhone 8 also counts with a lot bigger sensor.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features a bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a very superior battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has a 4050mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.