Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 12 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-06-29 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| -- | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is slightly better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's score of 77.6. LG V50 ThinQ is an a lot older phone than the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, but it's thinner and much lighter anyway. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a lot better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. They have 6 GB of RAM memory and 8 cores. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a back camera with a much worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in low light situations and a way bigger sensor. LG V50 ThinQ features a quite bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a bit longer battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 1% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.