Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| -- | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 399 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a global score of 91.8, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's 77.6 score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G design is somewhat thinner and incredibly lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it was released 2 years before.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a very superior performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. Galaxy A71 5G has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little worse display pixels density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a quite bigger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a little bit better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Galaxy A71 5G features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a much larger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a camera with a lot higher resolution. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.