Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M31 has an overall score of 86.5, which is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's general score of 77.6. The Samsung Galaxy M31 body is lighter and thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Both devices in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy M31 has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12.
Galaxy M31 features a better looking screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a bit better quantity of pixels per display inch. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy M31, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy M31 counts with a lot better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and the same RAM amount. Samsung Galaxy M31 captures way better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy M31 also has a much bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.