Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-06-29 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.37 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 7.09 ounces |
| -- | Cloud silver, Lavender purple, Midnight black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 457.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 514 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.12 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note9 is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, with an 87.1 score against 77.6. Galaxy Note9's construction is somewhat lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, although it was released 4 years before. The Galaxy Note9 features an extremely better processor than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy Note9 has a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960 resolution and a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with slightly more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note9, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB.
Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note9, because it has a 1 percent larger battery size. The Samsung Galaxy Note9 counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a lot lower 12 MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.