Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-06-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 8.29 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 399 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 642L GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 6.12 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4050mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, with a global score of 77.8 against 77.6. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is newer, a little bit lighter and noticeably thinner than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro. Both phones we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has 10 GB more RAM. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better screen than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a bigger screen and a just a little more pixels per inch of display.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a way bigger camera sensor and a larger aperture. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features more memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.