Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| -- | OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.45 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 11 Pro is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a score of 84.9 against 80.1. Even though the iPhone 11 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released with only a couple of months difference, the iPhone 11 Pro is extremely thinner and lighter. The iPhone 11 Pro has iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro works with Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
Apple iPhone 11 Pro has a bit sharper display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a little less pixels per inch of screen and a little bit worse 1125 x 2436px resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much greater memory to install applications and games than iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
The iPhone 11 Pro counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and slower, and they both have 4 GB of RAM, the iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. Apple iPhone 11 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting pictures or videos in low light situations, and they both have a camera in the back with a 12 MP resolution and a same size camera sensor, the Apple iPhone 11 Pro also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much better battery performance than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 48 percent larger battery size.
IPhone 11 Pro not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.