Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2016-09-16 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 969.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 7 Plus is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 83.8 score against 80.1. Apple iPhone 7 Plus's construction is much thinner and extremely lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit faster processing unit than iPhone 7 Plus, because it has a larger number of cores and 1 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better display than Apple iPhone 7 Plus, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display. IPhone 7 Plus shoots much better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photos and videos in low-light environments and a tinier back camera sensor shooting worse quality photos, and they both have a back-facing camera with a 12 megapixels resolution, the iPhone 7 Plus also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
The iPhone 7 Plus counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a really longer battery life than iPhone 7 Plus, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The iPhone 7 Plus not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheaper than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.